The arXiv problem
arXiv is a preprint server: anything can be uploaded by any author. That openness is the point — but it means "on arXiv" on its own says almost nothing about peer review. Researchers triaging a long arXiv reading list have to manually check which papers eventually landed at a top venue.
The extension closes that loop by resolving each preprint to its journal-or-conference of record via OpenAlex / Semantic Scholar metadata, then surfacing the CORE rank (for CS conferences) or SJR quartile (for journals) right in the abstract header.
How the arXiv integration works
On arxiv.org abstract pages, the extension picks up the arXiv ID from the URL and queries our API. The API uses OpenAlex to resolve the preprint to its final publication venue (when one exists), then returns the matching CORE / SJR / ABDC / FT50 record.
If a preprint hasn't been published yet — common for very recent uploads — the badge area stays empty. No fake signal, no fuzzy guess.
Which rankings matter on arXiv
- CORE A* / A / B / C — the most-cited CS conference ranking. 284 venues covered, refreshed on every CORE release.
- SJR quartile — when the preprint was eventually published as a journal article rather than a conference paper.
- OpenAlex citation impact — percentile-banded fallback for venues outside the ranked lists.
A note on preprints
A preprint with no ranking badge isn't necessarily low-quality — it may simply not have been published yet, or have been published at a venue that isn't in any of the major lists. Treat the badge as additional information, not as a verdict.
Works elsewhere too
The same data shows up on Google Scholar, PubMed and Semantic Scholar.